Chevaline shootings … Saad Al-Hilli … Sylvain Mollier … Brett Martin … Philippe D… and Xavier Baligant …

  On September 5, three months ago today, four people were brutally shot down near the French town of Chevaline, 600 kms (372 miles) from Paris and just 60 kms (40 miles) from the Swiss city of Geneva. I’ve written about it here and here and here. Comments on those four threads have closed, so […]


On September 5, three months ago today, four people were brutally shot down near the French town of Chevaline, 600 kms (372 miles) from Paris and just 60 kms (40 miles) from the Swiss city of Geneva.

I’ve written about it here and here and here.

Comments on those four threads have closed, so if you want to join our debate you should do so below on this thread.

There is still no certainty as to what had happened that Wednesday afternoon of the shootings.

This is what Prosecutor Eric Maillaud said when he last spoke to a journalist.

A horse butcher in Paris … gives another meaning to the name Chevaline …


A chevaline butcher always displays a bronze horse’s head …


UPDATE:  Sunday, December, 9, 2012

When the killer is, or the killers are, apprehended and brought to justice what do they risk?

They will not be sentenced to death. This is for sure. France abolished capital punishment – death by guillotine – in 1981, but had not guillotined anyone after September 1977.

Prosecutor of Annecy, Eric Maillaud, is supervising two judicial enquiries – informations judiciares – for this case which the French call la tuerie de Chevaline – the Chevaline killing or slaughter.

One is for assassination.

The other is for attempted assassination.

The first is of course for the quadruple assassination of the adults, while the latter is for the attempt to kill seven-year-old Zainab Al-Hilli.  I suppose that at a later stage the prosecutor could make it a double attempted assassination by adding the name of the four-year-old discovered alive in the rear well of the BMW.

(In France assassination is what premeditated murder is called. Killing someone, in say some kind of accident or in a lover’s tiff (a crime of passion) is called murder – meurtre.

So what could the sentence be should the killer/killers be found guilty?

For assassination the punishment is life in prison. (Art. 221-3.) Le meurtre commis avec préméditation constitue un assassinat. Il est puni de la réclusion criminelle à perpétuité.

For murder the punishment is 30 years in prison. (Art. 221-1.) As given in the Code Pénal (Criminal Code) Le fait de donner volontairement la mort à autrui constitue un mertre. Il est [imi de trente ans de réclusion criminelle.

There is also Art. 222.7 which stipulates – Violence leading to death without the intension of doing so is punished with fifteen years of imprisonment. A lawyer could claim that the death of the Al-Hillis and of Sylvain Mollier were unintentional. Les violences ayant entraîne la mort sans intention de la donner sont punies de quinze ans de réclusion criminelle.

As for the attack on Zainab Al-Hilli, it also is defined under Art. 221 of the Criminal Code and the sentence depends on the victim’s age (in France a minor is under the age of 15) and the circumstances of the criminal act. The sentence could be from five  to fifteen years.

If the smuggling of drugs was involved in the murders then more years will be added.

For example Art. 222-34 stipulates: The fact of controlling or organizing a group having for object the illegal production, manufacture, import, export, transport, possession, offer, supply, acquisition or use of drugs is punished by life imprisonment and a fine of €7,500,000. Yes, that is the amount incredible as it may seem.


No connection between the Al-Hilli killings and that of Xavier Baligant.

The shooting of Iraqi-born Saad Al-Hilli, 50, his wife Iqbal, 47, and her mother Suhalia Iqbal, 74, and that of Frenchman Sylvain Mollier, 45, is being regarded by the French investigators as unprecedented for France.

They say that the Claygate-based family’s cold-blooded murder on Wednesday, September 5, and the fatal July 19, 2011 shooting of Belgian Xavier Baligant, 29, were carried out by different killers.

The French gendarmes on the case are certain that Mr. Baligant was shot down in carjacking that went very wrong, and that his killer, or perhaps his killers, as motorway carjacking is usually carried out by a team of two or more, will only be found should they carry out a similar fatal carjacking which would lead to their immediate on-the-spot arrest.

Xavier Baligant, divorced, was driving home to the town of Pont-à-Celles in Belgium after a camping holiday in the Ardèche department of the French region of Rhône-Alpes. (France is divided into regions and each region into departments which in turn are divided into communes.)

On the rear seat of Mr. Baligant’s car were seated his two children, aged seven and five.

The three still had over 300 km (186 miles) to drive and once they were on the A31 toll road the two children fell asleep on the rear seat.

When Mr. Baligant was nearing the town of Colombey-les-Belles beyond which the motorway was free, he pulled up in the Malvaux rest area.

Malvaux rest area

It was going on for two in the morning and the rest area which consisted of just a public convenience and a phone booth was quiet.

Traffic moving in the other direction had another rest area, that of Faverosse, across the motorway.

Twenty-four trucks were parked in the two rest areas, their drivers, asleep in their berths.

At around 2 a.m. an employee of the motorway operating company APRR – Autoroutes Paris-Rhin-Rhône – patrolling the motorway heard shots. He thought they came from the direction of the Malvaux and Faverosse rest areas and immediately drove in that direction.

He found the lifeless body of a man lying in front of the toilet in the Malvaux rest area. He had been shot to death.

On the rear seat of a car parked nearby two small children lay asleep. They would later tell the investigators that their dad had told them that he was pulling up to go to the toilet but that they must stay in the car and sleep.

With the arrival of the APRR man some of the truck drivers were awakened by the patrol car’s flashing light and came over to see what was going on. The others had to be awakened later by gendarmes.

Not one of the 24 had heard shots: the tests on the hands of all for gun powder residue were negative.

Mr. Baligant had been shot four times. Three shots were aimed at his chest. The fourth, fired from above him, in other words he was on the ground, had hit him in the chin, traveled through his head and had exited through the top of the skull. The autopsy would show that the first of the three chest shots had been the fatal one. The final shot told the police that the killers or killers wanted to make certain that Mr. Baligant was dead and unable to talk.

Today the investigators believe that another vehicle had pulled up in the rest area at the same time as Mr. Baligant and an attempted carjacking had resulted.

When Mr. Baligant had refused to hand over the keys of his car, the carjacker had shot him dead. He had injuries to his hands which meant that there had been some degree of physical violence before the carjacker had gone started shooting.

Then, after having shot Mr. Baligant and getting to his victim’s car and seeing that there were two sleeping children on the rear seat, the killer had raced off in his own car, probably one that was old and in poor condition – and stolen – and which he had planned to abandon.

Or, if there were two or more carjackers, and there had not been two children in Mr. Baligant’s car, one would have driven off in Mr. Baligant’s car. The latter had left the keys in the ignition.

In that month of July there had been several carjackings in car parks in Paris’s more upper-class arrondissements. The modus operandi was always the same: the carjacker would threaten the car owner with a firearm, take the keys of his car and his credit card and having obtained the pin code and having withdrawn a large amount of money, would lock the car owner in the boot of his car to let him out only when out in the countryside.

The cars were not found. The police believe that they were ‘cleaned’ – registration plates were changed – and the cars were driven across the European Union’s open borders into Eastern Europe and especially to Albania where crime has reached endemic levels.

The French investigators also see no link between the firearms used in the Chevaline and the Malvaux-Faverosse shootings.

Despite that both types of firearms allegedly used had once been used by the Swiss army – a 7.55 calibre Schmidt-Rubin K31 at Malvaux-Faverosse and a 7.65 calibre Luger at Chevaline – the French investigators say that there is a glut of firearms in Europe because of the collapse of the Communist Bloc and the end of the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia.

Automatic and semi-automatic handguns – pistols and revolvers – rifles, and even assault weapons like AR-15s and AK-47s can be bought at an affordable price if one knows where to look.

In 1997 alone during an armed rebellion in Albania caused when a financial pyramid scheme collapsed, there were an estimated 226,000 Kalashnikovs and another 25,000 machine guns circulating among the people.  Because of that rebellion there was a mass emigration of Albanians into Italy, Greece, Switzerland and Germany, and some of those weapons left Albania as well.

The French investigators therefore give little credence to the belief that the  killer of the Al-Hillis and of Mr. Mollier was a local gun collector who had decided it was time to see if his old Luger could still a job correctly.

There had been reports that the gendarmes were studying CCTV footage of the A31 toll road and the various rest areas.

At the entrance of the Malvaux rest area there was a camera which recorded at a 360° angle.  The scene of the shooting was 150 meters (492 ft.) from that camera. There were also other cameras filming on the A31 and at the nearest toll gates. However, the killer or killers could have arrived on any of the numerous small adjoining roads. As a trucker told journalists there is a lot of illegal activity on those roads and in that border region. He said that when a trucker sees a motorist hand a bag to another motorist he “looks the other way”.

The APRR guy, who has not been identified, but lives in the region’s town of Bicqueley (fewer than 900 inhabitants), needed post traumatic stress counselling.

APRR’s motorways.

APRR employs 3,870 people who are responsible for approximately 2,300 kms (1,430 miles) of motorways and its cameras film on average 23,400 vehicles daily.

Their cameras transmit its footage ‘live’ to the Ops Room (Operational Room) of the motorway police (C.R.S. 30) in the town of Chaumont.

The cameras are to monitor the flow of traffic, speeding and other violations of the law – thefts, hold-ups, aggression, drug dealing – and well …murder.

APRR patrol men also visit a rest area every four hours when cleaners also clean the parking area, the toilets and the phone booth.

The question is: how come that after 18 months the APRR’s cameras have not yet ‘talked’.

This we do not know, but in the August 1997 death of Princess Diana and her lover Mr. Dodi Al-Fayed, the story was that CCTV footage of the road Ritz Hotel acting security chief, Henri Paul, had taken that night, as well as the CCTV footage at the entrance and exit and in the Alma tunnel itself where Paul had smashed the couple’s Mercedes into a supporting pillar, would reveal what had gone on that night.


There were no cameras on that road and no cameras aimed at the entrance or exit of the tunnel or inside it.

There was one camera. This was a camera on Place de l’Alma at the exit of the tunnel, but it was switched off.

Why was that camera switched off?

The spy cameras on the streets of France’s cities, towns and villages are controlled by a special section of the police force – the Direction de l’Ordre Public et de la Circulation (DOPC). In a large city like Paris the DOPC has several Ops Rooms, each watching a particular area of the city. The men in the Ops Room of the Place de l’Alma area stop work at 11 p.m. and then the cameras are switched off.

Maybe the APRR’s cameras on the Malvaux rest area had been switched off: It was 2 a.m. anyway and the only activity on rest areas at that time of the night happens in the dreams or nightmares of truckers.


Update : Sunday, 2013-01-20 — Exclusive

 One hundred and thirty-eight days ago this massacre took place.

As far as we know the French investigators and their English counterparts have no idea as to the identity of the murderer.

Prosecutor Eric Maillaud spoke of ten years passing before this abominable crime could or would be solved.

This past week a 10-year-old murder was solved. As happens here in France most of us have forgotten about the murder of a young (22 years old) bank manager named Elodie Kulik. Her murderer or murderers had raped her and had then set her body alight during the night of 10/11 January 2002.  She had not returned home after work and her car was found abandoned and then ten days later her partially-burnt remains.

Exactly a year ago her rapist and murderer – or one of them – was identified through DNA found on a condom which had been left near her body. The DNA matched that of a 22-year-old man, Gregory Wiart, an apprentice plumber, with a rape conviction. Alas, he was dead: he had died in a car accident in 2003.

However, last week seven men, friends and acquaintances of Wiart, and between the ages of 29 and 45, were arrested. Of the seven, all of them blue collar workers and all with criminal convictions, though not of rape, two have been released.

For the past ten years, while we forgot about the case, the investigators have been putting together a profile of Wiart’s life, watching and following those he had befriended in his miserable life, and tapping their telephones.  Also, Miss Kulik had had a chance to dial the emergency services on her cell/mobile and there were man’s voices on the recording of the call and painstakingly the police had searched for the owners of those voices: they are among the seven being held now.

Also last week the police arrested two men in connection with the fatal shooting of three women members of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) in their office here in Paris. The two, Kurds born in Turkey, aged 39 and 41, and in the three women’s circle of collaborators and friends, were, as is always said in the UK ‘helping the police with their inquiries  but the stories they told did not tally. Questioned again they had even changed their tales.

Now I will get to the reason I am updating my article about the Al-Hilli killings.

The French investigators are to re-question all those they have already questioned, and this means that witness Brett Martin has been requested to return to France for another interrogation. He can refuse to do so, but this means that should he ever again set foot on French soil he could be arrested and kept until the police have questioned him again.


I have now closed comments.






Marilyn Z. Tomlins

1,121 Responses

3-5-2013 at 09:31:29


Thanks for the information on the legal questions!

3-5-2013 at 17:53:09


I don’t really want to start a dispute whether these forestry guys existed or not, for one thing, Eric Maillaud knows so he could easily tell us.

But I think that your speculations above show how complicated the whole scenario becomes when these forestry guys are introduced. Even simply things become absurd. I can’t believe that these guys met the motorcycle in a prohibited area, and then showed/followed the motorcycle out of the area, and can’t give a good description of the motorcycle. It makes you wonder which chemicals these guys were using that day.

3-5-2013 at 18:07:22
3-5-2013 at 19:58:45

@Bachus Re:Speculation

It was me whom you quoted with that Speculation thing not Max. Nevermind …
Remembering the Al-Hillis today and praying for the girls.

3-5-2013 at 21:25:14


Do you mean that below is NOT a fact??

‘Cette moto, qui s’était aventurée sur des sentiers forestiers, “avait été reconduite dans le chemin de la combe d’Ire par des agents de l’ONF”, a indiqué le procureur.’


Because here it is EM who says so! And the way it is written, I dont think he is misquoted (for starters no language barrier)

And about complexity … you are right! I’m a man of simplicity, most other ppl are NOT:)

The complexity you speak about arises from just 3 elements (SM, MC, ONF) ‘sandwiched’ between 2 witnesses (Z and BM)

I don’t need to tell you that allmost ALL other persons make the case a kzillion times more complex by bringing in stuff ranging from Swiss money to Iraq nuclear stuff to Mossad paranoia.

Nope, with me you are safe … I’ll always look for the most basic/simple solution with as few elements as possible based on strict facts … a bit like a ‘SUDOKU’;)

— Max

3-5-2013 at 21:29:21

To add …

… and most of these ‘fancy’ theories dont bother with details. E.g. dont bother with a proper timeline. They just ‘teleport’ any element needed for ‘their theory’ in and out like in a episode of Star Trek without any problem:)

My speculated scenario at least accounts for ALL details!

Name a fact detail not accounted for and I will work on it;)

— Max

3-5-2013 at 21:35:14

And to conclude …

Both those same ppl getting tired of ‘fancy’ stuff because it always seems to ‘fail’ … just DUMP all known facts/detail and go for ‘give it up, wont be solved’ … it was a ‘nutter’ because then we dont have to explain anything anymore.

I’m a good programmer/database man. I’m used to work with information flows and am used in accounting EVERY BIT (literally;)

That is needed! (a bit like a good accountant, good bookkeeping of all the facts will bring you a lot closer to the solution. Just account for and explain every penny;)

— Max

3-5-2013 at 22:13:03


From your links this quote

‘À cette étape, une chose reste à faire, livre le procureur d’Annecy Éric Maillaud. Relire intégralement, à tête reposée, l’ensemble du dossier, page par page, pour chercher un détail, un lien, qui aurait pu échapper aux enquêteurs jusqu’ici. Nous sommes probablement encore loin de mettre un point final à ce dossier.’

Taking this

‘pour chercher un détail, un lien, qui aurait pu échapper aux enquêteurs’


The detail is the ONF statement (‘do not remember BM’) versus BM (‘saw ONF’)

That is a detail. At this moment THAT is (for me) the most cumbersome detail in this whole case. HOW is that possible?

I search old NTZ threads for this

SYMONDS: Now, on your way up, before you came across this scene, two vehicles passed you. You’ve been able to give police a limited description. Talk me through what you saw.
MARTIN: Well, bearing in mind I had been out riding for about an hour and a half, so I was getting fairly tired and I was sort of grinding up a steep hill on my mountain bike, pretty much just looking down at the road in front of me, because of the sort of steepness and sort of exertion needed. And I had a recollection at some point of probably a four-by-four coming past me ,it was a large vehicle. And again a motorbike at some point passed me going down and that’s really ,they were the only noticeable things for anybody coming down before I reached the car park.
SYMONDS: Have you any idea of how many people in the car – the four by four?
MARTIN: If someone asks you “what are the last three cars you saw?” and you hadn’t been primed to consider what they are and try to remember them, it’s pretty hard to think back, because they were completely unremarkable and in contrast someone said “the next three cars, remember what they are”, you’d be primed and you’d remember it probably quite clearly, so unfortunately I’d love to say I saw everything, but unfortunately I didn’t see how many people in the car I didn’t get much detail on the car because I was just riding my bike an they were just some arbitrary cars that were passing me as every car on every day of the week does.
SYMONDS: If the police were to say to you “can you identify anybody in that vehicle or on the motorbike?”, what would your response be?
MARTIN: No, I mean the motorcyclist had a helmet on and the car.. I was more looking down at the road ahead of me. Because It was a single track road. I was sort of trying to keep to the edge, to sort of make space for the car to get past me, so I had no reason to be. I didn’t sort of clock every driver that past me. So, no, I wouldn’t have – I couldn’t even tell you whether there was one or ten people in the car. Obviously it must have had a driver, but that’s about it.
SYMONDS: Now one of the difficulties we understand the police are having is that several of the eye witness accounts differ as to timing that these vehicles passed. Were you able to give an exact time that you saw those vehicles come past you?
MARTIN: No, because , if you think back, obviously I was on a hill climb, on that last hill for half an hour, so just at some point you know, midway up the hill, the vehicle, and then a little bit later a motorcycle passed me, quite unremarkable events at the time.
SYMONDS: It’s a half hour time scale getting from bottom to top?
SYMONDS: So at some point in that half an hour, before you came across the scene, those vehicles came down. Were they being driven in a fast way, were they, was there anything suspicious about them at all?
MARTIN: No, nothing at all, just unremarkable.

== the vehicle, and then a little bit later a motorcycle passed me ==

== I was sort of trying to keep to the edge, to sort of make space for the car to get past me ==

— Max

3-5-2013 at 22:22:53


Your above post is wonderful. Thank you very very much!

And Max, I am no good at accounting …

3-5-2013 at 22:39:58


re:The Forestry guys

Frustrating isn’t it? We even have to speculate whether they ever existed and so on: who saw them, where and when.

We really know so very little of what had gone on there that day.

You are all doing very well here and I am sure that the very many visitors who come to read this blog every day agree with me.

3-5-2013 at 23:28:00


“So, the MC and 4×4 seen by BM coming down are accounted for imho. the 4×4=ONF and MC=X”

“(Ah, always fun to speculate … especially if it all could be true;)”

Ok Max, I think that your theory is very close to the TRUTH. But 4X4 =ONF perhaps is not the good equation.

3-5-2013 at 23:46:29


No, I am not saying that YOU are making it up, but as said, introducing these forestry guys adds more questions than it answers. You have mentioned a couple of these questions above and I could add some.

I think that the scenario without these guys is pretty straight forward. But with these guys also somewhere in the area there are a lot of questions to be asked.

1. We know nothing of their movements before and after the killings. I think that it would be normal procedure by any investigator to ask these persons were they have been prior to their meeting with the mc and where they went afterwards. These questions however do not seem to interest the prosecutor.

2. If they met the MC on the parallell road, escaping from the murder scene, which is the only place possible according to the time-line, they were so close that they could very well (or even probably) have heard the shooting. The investigators have investigated why Brett-Martin heard no shots, but they seem to have overlooked to investigate why these forestry guys heard no shots.

3. As you said above they passed Brett-Martin on Route Forestiere. Since we know from our time-line that he was the only person that they met on that road, and since the road is very narrow and winding it is very hard to imagine that they could have missed him.

4. It is also very unclear from Brett-Martins statement in which order he saw the MC and the car. He doesn’t seem to connect them. Otherwise he should have said something like “I met a MC followed by a car” (or vice versa).

5. Brett-Martin statement is also conspiciously vague concerning the MC and the car. While he remembers the cyclist (Sylvain Mollier) that he passed much earlier so well that he can identify the dead body at the crime scene as the same man, he can hardly even remember the colour of the car and nothing more, and they were also the only vehicles he met on Route Forestiere.

6. No one except Brett-Martin has seen the car and the MC, not a witness in Chevaline, so where did they go?

The aftermath:

7. Why did it take weeks for the police to get in contact with these forestry guys? Did they not speak French? Did they not belong to the local community? Did they not read newspapers? Had they suddenly left the country?

8. As you pointed out above (and I am well aware of it), suddenly Eric Maillaud says that the police has spoken to them. But still not an explanation why they have not come forward earlier. Not any information how many people there were in the car and so forth. Have they taken part in any reconstruction of the crime? Who are they?

The French privacy laws seem here to take on absolutely absurd proportions. And then Eric Maillaud is irritated that he can’t investigate american privately owned servers at his will !?

3-5-2013 at 23:51:33


Please, Please start a new thread now!!

My computer can’t handle this huge amount of comments:

3-6-2013 at 00:23:17

@oui 1-4-2013 at 13:00:46

 “If the shooter is named Florian B., why do the villagers refer to him as “Cédric?”

Like me, try to answer this question and maybe you will get a surprise!

3-6-2013 at 00:35:50


Given: BM arrives at Martinet 15:43
Meets ONF 4×4 halfway up climb
Xing Chemin de la Combe d’Ire is 900m down from Martinet
It is not possible ONF and MC met after killings!
My timetable …

From your data, I conclude the murder took place at 15:30 hours +/- 2 min.

15:30 Martinet
15:24 Xing Chemin de la Combe d’Ire
15:20 Halfway climb
15:10 Begin climb at sign

15:43 Martinet
15:34 Xing Chemin de la Combe d’Ire
15:32 Meets MC near Xing Chemin de la Combe d’Ire
15:30 ONF 4×4
15:16 Begin climb at sign

ONF – Down
15:26 MC
15:28 Xing Chemin de la Combe d’Ire
15:30 Meets BM halfway climb
15:34 Begin climb at sign

15:48 Martinet
15:45 Xing Chemin de la Combe d’Ire
15:44 Halfway climb
15:40 Begin climb at sign

MC – Down
15:26 ONF 4×4
15:30 Martinet
15:32 Meets BM near Xing Chemin de la Combe d’Ire
15:34 Halfway climb
15:38 Begin climb at sign

Enjoy! 🙂 😉

3-6-2013 at 00:56:41

@Lars and all,

Be assured that I’m very critical to my own stuff. I’m aware that BM’s staement are not 100% solid. The order 4×4 and then MC … I guess he has got that right. But the timing? He seems to recollect about ‘half-way’ … but half-way 30 minutes = 15 minutes … which WILL NOT fit into the timeline (parallel road)

Perhaps BM (because of fatigue) experienced 8 minutes like 15 minutes … who knows.

On the other hand … Lars, your point 7 is SPOT ON … what took ONF/4×4 so long to come forward … not to mention the MC, who was seen by 2(!) witnesses (ONF and BM). Why did MC not come forward??

Now to me (if timeline-wise it fits) that makes MC = X
And ONF, with their weird statements, looking suspicious

If you look at the map (timeline, below their is a map, the orange dot) you will see that the only possible road/route which ONF/MC could have taken intersects with the main road at 1 kilometer from Martinet. It places ONF (and MC) within 1 km and 4-5 minutes from the killing.

ONF did not come forward directly. ‘Something’ made them act like this


Hmmm, I have to think this over again. I have the feeling I miss something.

3-6-2013 at 09:37:56


OK, this thread has been closed now and you can continue to comment here

comment continue here

I intended to start a new thread when we reached 1000 comments, but I wanted to update on the new thread and did not have time to do so. (Busy with something else.)

Anyway, I intend to write something about France’s cybercops and how long the case will remain open before it becomes a cold case. But it will have to wait still a few days.

3-6-2013 at 09:39:45


Scheduling of all persons involved and account for the witness statements, leaves little room voor variations. If time 15:32 when MC passes BM is moved later to 15:36, MC would have passed PD in their climb to Martinet. It is almost impossible for ONC not to have seen SM on his bike somewhere, unless ONC remained on the parallel road Chemin de la Combe d’Ire. But like you said, were they in or out of their vehicle and didn’t the forest guys hear the shots and revving of BMW or commotion. Did the rushing water of the stream muffle the sound of this crime?

From the timeline, the forest guys have become more than suspicious, one might say suspect. One other possibility, the ONF vehicle was beyond parking Martinet and heard the motorbike coming from the direction Col du Cherel. The ONF halted the motorbike on the steep climb above parking Martinet to give a verbal warning. The ONF vehicle traveled down at 15:26 from my timeline (above). MC or killer X, a bit shaken after meeting ONF, checks his watch and knows SM must be close-by. Missed the presence of BMW and SAH family. Grabs his pistol and runs down to Martinet, starts firing as soon as he sees SM at 25m distance near barrier. Killings continues for 90 seconds and explains EM’s remark the killer moved in a hectic way. Leaves Martinet at 15:30 hours and passes BM at 15:32, moves at fast pace downhill so he misses PD in vehicle who starts climb at 15:40.

BM’s witness statement just hours after the killing, places direct suspicion on motorbike MC and/or vehicle (confirmed later as ONF). Why was there no urgency to locate MC from the earliest start of the police investigation? Was the bureaucracy a delaying factor under whose jurisdiction this isolated place of the murder would fall? It was very near the borderline Savoie and Haute Savoie.

If killer X was a local of the older generation with (para)military training, the Savoie people will protect their own no matter what. From content of history and drive for autonomy, the struggle against occupation in WWII and isolation from the Paris national interest makes a wall of silence possible. From my (re)writing of the last chapter, the CS family plays a prominent role in the village of Grignon, the skisport and close family/friends in the old military of the Savoie. It’s likely the persons employed by ONF in the Résereve Nationale des Bauges are very familiar with the locale due to their service in the paramilitary. As for a motive, whatever happened to the link of SM to his work for protestgroup nuclear pollution CRIIRAD?

3-6-2013 at 09:40:12


Please read message about new thread: 2013/03/06 at 9.37 am

See you on the new thread.

3-6-2013 at 09:41:49

Wow, I sqeaked that last comment in!

2-11-2014 at 01:28:43


One of our visitors a short while ago advised the following website.

January 2017
« Dec    



Disponible: - édition broché; format kindle; format abonnementkindle

Le livre sera bientôt disponible aussi dans les librairies en france


Should you wish to contact me you can do so by email:

Blog Archive

If you wish not to miss one of my blogs, do subscribe.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



- For the Love of a Poet - a novel set in the Soviet Union.
In Paperback and e-book


A love story set in Paris and Normandy, France

A novel:
Bella ... A French Life. In Paperback and e-book


My book

The horrific story of WW2 French serial killer Dr Marcel Petiot, France's most prolific killer.

Bella … A French Life – The Cookbook

Bella … A French Life – The Cookbook

Do you like good food? Well, why not try some of Bella's recipes?